vs
Hi,

will be posting tennis selections in 2 systems:
a) aggressive wagering on big favs
b) flat stakes on average fa
Now, I know what you will say - huge favs, small odds,
no chance of winning long term. I think this approach
is wrong: if the odds represent true chance of winning
and we see value (odds not corresponding with our
own prediction), then it can be profitable if we are
correct. It doesnt matter if we take huge favs,
big dogs or ATS around $1.9-1.95.

What is meant by aggressive wagering? We will be
starting with small bank and will be betting 20% of it
on every match. If more than 5 matches will be selected
at the same time, the amount will be split accordingly.
After everz day, the bank will be re-calculated. When
higher (winning) 30% of profit will be taken out and
counted as "spare-account".

No chasing losses, no parlays.

OK, lets start.

A) starting bank: 100 pts
Bet 1: Ferrer to beat Dell Acqua @ 1,11 - 25 pts to win 2,75 pts (Ordina Open)
Bet 2: Spadea to beat Slabinsky @ 1,26 - 25 pts to win 6,5 pts (Slazenger Open)

B) starting bank: 100 pts
Bet 1: Vaidisova to beat Govortsova @ 1,46 - 2 pts to win 0,92 pt (International Open)