You can get handicapping matchup reports for most games at http://www.docsports.com/free-picks/

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

'16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

    LABore-ATORY PIX THREAD.

    RX's, i.e. Levels of Play. #'s equal units.

    1. INVESTOR
    2. MEMBER:
    3. EXPLORER:
    4. Adventurer
    5. POWER DRIVER !


    upcoming . .

  • #2
    Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

    Tourney Talk. TENN. vs. ORE.
    Neither one of these two teams looked in sync yesterday, seriously underperforming. And Tennessee scored one more pt. (62) off of Wisc. than Oregon (61) did off of Geo.Town. WTH! What's that recovery drink called?
    And Oregon does not seem "in form" yet. They made a helluva a run at last year's Final Four, though. . . Why did I think Chris Boucher was a senior last year? And Elgin Cook is gone. . .
    Anyways, they had their heads in the **** fog yesterday, but not as much as Tennessee. Still Oregon has more weapons, though the Tenn. coach (Rick Barnes) has always been a great Tournament Coach; and they really need another win.

    BTW, Tennessee was throwing up some Beeswax for "shots" most of the game after the refs had " all of all the teams" (esp. Whisky) in handcuffs. Foul trouble by the nine(9) minute mark of the first half. Psst, Oregon is #1 in blocked shots inDiv 1. Why isn't the total falling as fast as the line?
    Under 152.5 Explorers!
    I know you Members are leaning Volunteers. What with the line move. I had the game pegged as Oregon -11, before they posted the odds. Anyways. I'll call it a lean on the Vols.And hope the vets don't "find their legs" on day three! Be careful and let's hope the refs don't take the "cuffs" off either! - Ivy

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

      LABore-ATORY PIX THREAD. 11/22 @ 9:20 AM

      RX's, i.e. Levels of Play. #'s equal units.

      2. MEMBER: CBB [543] Tennessee +13 (-102)
      3. EXPLORER: [544] TOTAL u154.5 -110 (Tenn. vrs Ore.)

      I'm "out" until the 6:00 Eastern time game!

      btw for me; i unit + .025 of my bankroll. "just saying"

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

        RX's, i.e. Levels of Play. #'s equal units.

        1. INVESTOR
        2. MEMBER:
        3. EXPLORER:
        4. Adventurer
        5. POWER DRIVER !

        2. MEMBER:Northwestern
        +4-110*
        Northwestern v Notre Dame
        144.5*-110*
        A THREE POINT FEST. "LIL BRO. GETS 'EM!

        Rabid Dog in a real cool way! Tips in 2mins.
        Last edited by ivywalkon; 11-22-16, 06:13 PM. Reason: Good Capps & Luck

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

          Thread results 11/22 (2-1-1) 67%

          2. MEMBER: CBB [543] Tennessee +13 (-102)_ W
          3. EXPLORER: [544] TOTAL u154.5 (-110) (Tenn. vrs Oregon)_ W
          2. MEMBER:Northwestern +4 (-110)_ P
          2. Northwestern vs. Notre Dame 144.5*(-110) oops was supposed to be an Under!


          More later today, maybe the VCU / Baylor if evident.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

            VCU ATS FULL GM. Explorer

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

              Originally posted by ivywalkon View Post
              VCU ATS FULL GM. Explorer
              That was a L.
              Trying
              Auburn +10-105 Explorer

              and I parlayed it to the over.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

                [QUOTE=ivywalkon;402222]That was a L.
                Trying
                Auburn +10-105 Explorer

                and I parlayed it to the over.[/QUOTE
                ]

                That was an L also Auburn ATS Score Purdue 96 - Aub. 71.
                A pounding. Game went over, but I did not declare it in the post as a pick.

                So Record goes to 2 - 3 - 1.
                May pick late. But not dealing well with multiple sports. Doing foorball today.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Wk. 13 nfl Lines Test

                  Sorry for putting these here. But hey check out to see if there's a contest. Put your money where your mouth is!

                  HTML Code:
                  NFL - DEC 01*				
                  TIME	ROT#    TEAM		SPREAD		TOTAL		ODDS*
                  5:25 PM	301*DAL COWBOYS	 	-3-127*		44 -105*	-171
                  	302*MIN VIKINGS		+3+107*		44-115*		151
                  
                  NFL - DEC 04*				
                  TIME	ROT#    TEAM		SPREAD		TOTAL		ODDS*
                  10:00 AM351*DEN BRONCOS		-4-110*		40 -110*	-225
                  	352*JAX JAGUARS		+4-110*		40-110*		185
                  10:00 AM353*KC CHIEFS		+4-115*		49-110*		175
                  	354*ATL FALCONS		-4-105*		49-110*		-205
                  10:00 AM355*HOU TEXANS		+6.5*-105*	45.5*-110*	240
                  	356*GB PACKERS		-6.5*-115*	45.5*-110*	-300
                  10:00 AM357*PHI EAGLES		PK-110*		42.5*-110*	
                  	358*CIN BENGALS		PK-110*		42.5*-110*	
                  10:00 AM359*DET LIONS		+6-110*		54-105*		225
                  	360*NO SAINTS		-6-110*		54-115*		-275
                  10:00 AM361*SFO 49ERS		+1-105*		43.5*-115*	103
                  	362*CHI BEARS		-1-115*		43.5*-105*	-123
                  10:00 AM363*LA RAMS		+13.5*-115*	44-109*		545
                  	364*NE PATRIOTS		-13.5*-105*	44-111*		-775
                  10:00 AM365*MIA DOLPHINS	+3-105*		40.5*-104*	145
                  	366*BAL RAVENS		-3-115*		40.5*-116*	-165
                  1:05 PM	367*BUF BILLS		+3-105*		49-105*		145
                  	368*OAK RAIDERS		-3-115*		49-115*		-165
                  1:25 PM	369*TB BUCCANEERS	+3.5*-105*	47.5*-110*	170
                  	370*SDG CHARGERS	-3.5*-115*	47.5*-110*	-200
                  1:25 PM	371*WAS REDSKINS	+3-120*		49-110*		130
                  	372*ARI CARDINALS	-3+100*		49-110*		-150
                  1:25 PM	373*NY GIANTS		+6-105*		48-110*		225
                  	374*PIT STEELERS	-6-115*		48-110*		-275
                  5:30 PM	375*CAR PANTHERS	+7-115*		44-106*		230
                  	376*SEA SEAHAWKS	-7-105*		44-114*		-290
                  
                  NFL - DEC 05*				
                  TIME	ROT#    TEAM		SPREAD	*	TOTAL		ODDS*
                  5:30 PM	377*IND COLTS		 -2-110*	48 -110*	ODDS*
                  	378*NY JETS		+2-110*		48-110*	

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

                    Thursday_ 12/1
                    Levels of Play
                    1. INVESTOR
                    2. MEMBER_ CBB Iowa State -7-110 Game
                    2. MEMBER_ CBB 1H Cincinnati v 1H Iowa State o66.5 -110- iH Total
                    3. EXPLORER
                    4. Adventurer
                    5. POWER DRIVER dba_ EGO FREAK

                    Took the 1H over. Though, that 1H IA. -3.5 ats is probably a better first half play. And the Game Line -7 IA.ST. is my main play.
                    Just feel that if IA ST. gets out to a fast start, CINN. may not have the manpower/style of play to catch them. And the data seems to confirm the visuals that IA. ST. has a better Defense this yr.
                    Also, apparently, these two also played to a 2pt. win for CINN. in Ohio? around this same time of year- last year. And the calibre of competition and form of IOWA ST. seems better than that of CINN. at this time of year.
                    A rare morning move for me, not totally LAB PICK researched. But the raw data is there. I'm gonna gave it a 2 Unit play for both. Hope I get back home in time to see the game.
                    Get it before the line goes up.
                    IH under players. That 1H total could go either way, especially if CINCY's Gary Clarke is unable to go. Careful on all above plays/opinions esp because I don't understand the early reverse line movement on the spread.
                    Good Luck & Good Capps

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

                      _ LAB THREAD / LABore-ATORY PIX

                      Levels of Play, i.e. RX
                      1. INVESTOR: Under down TO U145.5
                      2. MEMBER: ND +5 (going against the line fall from -6.5)
                      with the under> PARLAY.
                      My write -up.

                      What do you do against a team that's long on the perimeter? When you're not?
                      Similar styles, though Nova seems more opportunistic in their conversions.
                      Both teams are relatively precise with their execution and good ball -handling, but can ND get the ball to their bigs - inside? Do they want to?
                      Can ND spread the floor, beat 'em off the bounce(the 3 D's), yet more importantly still maintain court balance to convert to defense effectively - without fouling.
                      And can either team find an offensive rhythm, i.e. execute. And likewise on defense establish a defensive pace?
                      I know Brunson and Bidges are good with the ball. And Is Booth really availably sound for this game?
                      Speed , Quicknes, boxing out, toughness(esp, the guards for ND), crucial for an upset. Toughness on "D", but they can't afford to get in foul trouble. Gonna need the "Luck of the Irish" in Jersey.
                      Should go Nova Under. But though not in the Garden, I'm certain Mike Brey hasn't missed these squareoffs since "Irish" went ACC!
                      And is it exams? Game Under. Though a bit of a tough sked. spot for Nova, No?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

                        Damn should have had that. But At least I got the under. The parlay was a bust.
                        But had I had time to read this, or had gotten it when the line was +6.5 for the Irish. . .
                        Have to watch the replay.

                        [QUOTE=ivywalkon;402483]_ LAB THREAD / LABore-ATORY PIX

                        Levels of Play, i.e. RX
                        1. INVESTOR: Under down TO U145.5
                        2. MEMBER: ND +5 (going against the line fall from -6.5)
                        with the under> PARLAY.
                        My write -up.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

                          Special Advisement:
                          DOG PARLOR

                          551 N. Dakota St. (+15)
                          with
                          553 Princeton (+5)
                          2 Units
                          Good Capps & Peace!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: '16/7 Hoops RX LAB THREAD.

                            Hey Guys & Gals, my humble apologies for the duration of my inconsistent picks and lack of accountability of late!
                            But what a life! Just checking in, men. Got a new project to get involved in. Letting you guys know taking a break for a few months from the Lounge. Good Luck to all the Cappers, Lurkers, Sharps and Squares.
                            Profits & Peace!
                            P.s.
                            Imho from both Pros to Preps having an Unsportsmanlike Penalty for Coaches for not being in the "Coaches Box" is kind of ludicrous when there are no penalties consistently enforced for having a coach on the court (between the lines of play) when the ball is live. :Banane01:
                            For me if I was still coaching or playing, I'd rather take that tradeoff anyday.
                            My point, unsportsmanlike conduct for players or coaches on or off the court especially when the ball is live should be penalized with extra shots for the team that's been harmed. It's an unfair advantadge unintended by the rules whether on the "home" or "visiting" court.
                            And BTW, so is a visiting team having to play five vs. eight when Conferences, Leagues, and Athletic Administrators can't get referees AND officials who cannot do THEIR jobs without without falling sway to the emotional tide of home court FANS/BULLYING!
                            And btw does anyone really know anymore what constitutes PI in football in the Pros or Preps. Shameful! Maybe a back judge is needed for both sides and the center of the field.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X